macmankev

We can't define anything precisely

This 'heat freezing water' article popped up on my radar (I just get too lazy to shut it and figure that banana man is cute) and so I read it Link post

livfm:

It sounded interesting enough, and it was although I don’t know why freezing water using heat would be helpful because the techniques they described sounded more complex than just buying a giant freezer. Anyway it just annoyed me because it seemed blatantly obvious nobody had read this article, and those who had wouldn’t have liked/reblogged it because it was just a bunch of chemistry with two interesting sentences. What I’m saying is that I want that fruit person again but made of a mandarin and not a banana.

It’s interesting science, but I think you’re right, no one actually read the article. I think many people were even thinking about heat as temperatures above freezing when in fact it’s just supercooled water being heated up. The water itself still has a temperature below the freezing point. The part I actually find more interesting is how the charge effects the way the water freezes.

And I agree, we need more fruit people.

Reblogged from livfm March 3rd, 2010 at 4:14 am 5 notes